Yasuhiro SAKAI, “J.M. Keynes VS. Frank Knight”
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Dynamic Trading and Asset Prices: Keynes vs. Hayek
We investigate the dynamics of prices, information and expectations in a competitive, noisy, dynamic asset pricing equilibrium model with long-term investors. We argue that the fact that prices can score worse or better than consensus opinion in predicting the fundamentals is a product of endogenous short-term speculation. For a given, positive level of residual payoff uncertainty, if noise tra...
متن کاملYasuhiro Yamamoto様.mcd
The assessment of residual tumors after treatment of malignant lymphoma (ML) is often difficult. Here we report a case of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with a huge sacral tumor. After chemotherapy and following radiation therapy, a residual mass was detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, a hypermetabolic lesion in the sacrum disappeared on Ffluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomograp...
متن کاملIasella JM
Purpose: To compare the post-extraction dimensional changes following extraction alone or extraction plus ridge preservation with an intrasocket mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane. 2 purpose is to determine whether there are significant differences between 2 procedures histologically.3 one is that a 4-monts and 6month implant placement time was evaluated to determin...
متن کاملInterpreting Caritas : Did Frank Knight and Ludwig Von Mises Get It Wrong ?
Knight and Mises claimed Christianity, both in its early history and in its modern political role, was incompatible with market economics. Competition to satisfy partners in voluntary exchange, investment, and the achievement of property and wealth received little or no sanction from a religion that preached “no thought for the morrow” and commanded “love of one’s neighbor.” Prompted by their d...
متن کاملFrank Knight on Risk, Uncertainty, and the Firm: a New Interpretation
W e attempt to interpret Frank Knight by taking him on his own terns. Among our conclusions are the following. (1) Knight's distinction between risk and uncertainty is not solely a distinction between insurable and uninsurable risk. (2) Knight's explanation for the existence of firms does not reduce to a moral-hWd theory, except perhaps in the broadest and least-interesting sense. And (3) Knigh...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Studies in Regional Science
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0287-6256,1880-6465
DOI: 10.2457/srs.46.243